Re: Git conversion status
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Git conversion status |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201009201957.o8KJvYh28575@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Git conversion status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> This is not even close to matching the tarballs :-(. Seems to be a > >> locale problem: the diffs look like > >> > >> 1c1 > >> < /* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/contrib/citext/citext.sql.in,v 1.3 2008/09/05 18:25:16 tgl Exp $ */ > >> --- > > /* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/contrib/citext/citext.sql.in,v 1.3 2008-09-05 18:25:16 tgl Exp $ */ > > > As a curiosity, I do prefer the dashed dates. I have had a number of > > cases where I have to change dashes to slashes when passing ISO dates as > > parameters to CVS. Shame they improve it just as we are leaving CVS. > > Yeah. It appears that this was prompted by a desire to match ISO style > going forward. I wouldn't be against that necessarily if we were > keeping the keywords and not getting rid of them. But since we are > going to get rid of them going forward, I think what we want this > conversion to do is match what's in the historical tarballs. Agreed, no question. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: