Re: "private" installation of postgres
От | Joshua J. Kugler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "private" installation of postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201009081139.37871.joshua@eeinternet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "private" installation of postgres (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "private" installation of postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Scott Ribe elucidated thus: > On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Personally, though, I think it's easier to change the default port > > number and not worry about sharing /tmp. Changing the port is a > > good idea anyway to avoid any possible conflicts on shared memory > > IDs. > > I was planning on changing the default port number (I forgot to state > that in my email), but also moving the socket dir just to be really > sure. If you do a private socket dir, and connect via that, you don't even have to listen on a TCP port at all. j -- Joshua Kugler Part-Time System Admin/Programmer http://www.eeinternet.com - Fairbanks, AK PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0x73B13B6A
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: