Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100824205648.GA2829@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104 (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104
Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104 Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02:41PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 24/08/10 16:35, Boxuan Zhai wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I finished the MERGE on inheritance tables. Now comes the merge_v201 > > Oh, great! That means that all the known issues are fixed now, and > all that's left is fixing any issues raised in review. > > I've added this to the September commitfest, but I hope I'll find > some time to look at this before that. I welcome anyone else to > review this too! I have to ask one question: On a short review of the discussion and the patch I didn't find anything about the concurrency issues involved (at least nodeModifyTable.c didnt show any). Whats the plan to go forward at that subject? I think the patch needs to lock tables exclusively (the pg level, not access exclusive) as long as there is no additional handling... Thanks for the work Boxuan! Andres PS: The patch reintroduces some whitespace damage...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: