Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201008241808.o7OI8x505603@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated
Backups), open item
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > I've been looking at the open item which belongs with this doc: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/backup-incremental-updated.html > > ... and my viewpoint is that the procedure described should be *cut* > from the official docs and put on the Wiki, with warnings. It's simply > far too hackish and dependant on DBA understanding of PostgreSQL > internals to belong in the main docs. > > In 9.1 we'll probably have some machinery to make taking snapshots of > the standby more reliable (like running pg_start_backup on the master), > and then that procedure will belong in the main docs. FYI, I am working on a doc update that will use pg_start/stop backup on the master, as suggested by Fujii Masao: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-08/msg00237.php -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: