Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100810111855.GD29153@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Hi, > > pg_dump allows us to select multiple target tables by using > multiple -t switches, but pg_restore does not. So, when > restoring multiple tables, we have to run pg_restore more > than once as follows. This is a pain to me. > > $ pg_restore -t tbl1 db.dump > $ pg_restore -t tbl2 db.dump > > Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t > switches as well as pg_dump? > > $ pg_restore -t tbl1 -t tbl2 db.dump > > Regards, Yes. :) What other functionality in pg_dump does pg_restore not duplicate? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: