Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100809130256.GA11439@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:18:33PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > I am working on Grouping Sets support. The first issue is "cube" > keyword. Contrib module "cube" define a few functions "cube". So if we > want to continue in support this function, then "cube" have to be a > unreserved keyword. The "cube" contrib module was only ever meant to be replaced by the real feature, which you're working on, so +1 for dropping everything in it that you are not replacing with the one which complies with the SQL standard. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: