Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100731110814.GS21875@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > After a bit of study of the code, it appears to me that it's not too > difficult to fix: we just have to use the expression's result type > rather than the index column's atttypid in the subsequent processing. > ANALYZE never actually looks at the index column contents (indeed > cannot, since our index AMs provide no API for extracting the contents), I don't think it'll be an issue, but just in case- is there any reason this will cause trouble for the possible index-only quals/scans work? > So that seems to make it not practical to back-patch. But we could get it into 9.0.. > I thought of an ugly hack that would avoid an API/ABI break: since > VacAttrStats.attr is a copy of the pg_attribute data, we could scribble > on it, changing atttypid, attlen, attbyval, etc to match the index > expression result type. This seems pretty grotty, but it would allow > the fix to be back-patched into existing branches. Yeah, that's rather nasty. :/ > Comments? I'm not sure which way to jump here. For my 2c- let's get it fixed for 9.0 cleanly and encourage people who run into this to upgrade to that once it's released. Perhaps I've missed it, but I don't recall seeing many complaints about this. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: