Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 00:59, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > On 07/12/2010 10:12 AM, Michael Alan Brewer wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com>
> >> ?wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It does to some degree. I mean, if we can only get quotes from the same
> >>> people year over year?
> >
> > Plus we're already in the position of potentially dropping one or more
> > quotes from the release due to having too many. ?So a returnee is a no-go, I
> > think.
> >
> > Speaking of which ... Ed from EnterpriseDB has offered a quote for the
> > release. ?I'm leaning against including it because I feel that we need to
> > establish the separation between the PostgresQL project and EnterpriseDB in
> > the minds of the press.
>
> Yeah, I agree with excluding it. There's too much confusion between
> those already, IMHO, no need to risk making that worse. I'm sure
> EnterpriseDB will put out their own press release soon after ;)
>
>
> > I could see potentially including a quote from him about the momentum of
> > postgresql development if he were to make such a quote (suggested quote
> > doesn't help the release much), but I could also see skipping it ... we have
> > a lot of quotes as-is, and Afilias and MyEmma are still pending. What do
> > other people think?
>
> If we have enough *good* quotes elsewhere, I think go with that. If we
> don't, then use a combination, with the proper quote from him.
Someone just posted about the international space station:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-07/msg00394.php
Seems this would be a good source for a quote.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +