Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201007100246.o6A2kQ811156@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie jul 09 20:01:55 -0400 2010: > > > Where are we on this? Application? dia? xfig? Number of colors? Once > > we decide these items, we can start adding diagrams. > > I think the first step is defining the source format. The proposed > patch uses the dia XML source format, but this is said to have some > drawbacks (namely: the source is too verbose, the generated png is too > bloated, and only one tool to handle it). SVG was also proposed as an > alternative, but there wasn't much discussion about it. And finally we > have xfig. > > So what is it? > > Maybe we could have diagrams generated by different tools; e.g. we could > use GraphViz for some things. OK, all the images on my presentations page are from xfig, and the representative file sizes are as below: 1092 query_ssl.fig 4370 query_ssl.png PNG image attached. What I like about xfig is that I can export EPS and embed those in PDF files as _raster_ images. Not sure we can use those in our PDFs though. I assume Dia has more image style options than xfig. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: