The Wednesday 07 July 2010 02:10:12, Rob Napier wrote :
> I am reposting my earlier request as I¹ve only received one comment and no
> offer to help.
>
> I attempted to pressgang Chris Travers onto the job but he agrees that I
> need help from someone who really understands the details.
>
> I¹d like to complete this task. Who has the in-depth knowledge and the time
> to help me work through this document so it can be ready for the release?
>
> On 1/7/10 11:14 PM, "Marc Cousin" <cousinmarc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2010/7/1 Rob Napier <rob@doitonce.net.au>
> >
> >> I¹m still finding plenty of repetition in this document. I think it can
> >> be made a lot punchier with some judicious editing.
> >>
> >> I'd like to set up a time to go over the document with someone more tech
> >> savvy than I am. Here is an example of the sort of thing I am unable to
> >>
> >> resolve without some help:
> >>> This time, the goal is improving the archiving mechanism to make it as
> >>> continuous as possible and to not rely on file shipping.
> >>
> >> Is file shipping a translation error or a valid technical term? I assume
> >> the former.
> >>
> >> I'd like to use Skype, ICQ or MSN chat to review. I think it would take
> >> about 12 hours. Perhaps over the weekend.
> >>
> >> Any volunteers?
> >
> > Now that I look at it, I see that in the documentation, the term used is
> > "file based log shipping."
I can help you, of course. At least, I would know what I was trying to express
in the original document :)
I'm on GMT+2, tell me if that's ok. I can do skype, ICQ, MSN, phone call,
whatever.