Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201007022143.o62Lh0w26764@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Documentation and explanatory diagrams (Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Robert Haas wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> OK, everyone seems to like requiring dia. > > > > I don't like it a bit. It's hard enough for people to build the docs as > > it is. > > Why should anyone build the docs? Its part of the tarball process, so the > only ppl that should be doing it are those coming from CVS, no ... ? People often built them to verify the SGML markup and to view the content/markup before submitting a doc patch. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: