Re: extensible enum types
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: extensible enum types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201006232205.o5NM5aJ21869@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: extensible enum types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: extensible enum types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Sorry to be commenting late, but don't most people want to add to the > > end or beginning of the enum list, rather than in the middle, and can't > > we support that already? > > We could allow adding a value, but we couldn't guarantee where it would > appear in the type's sort ordering. Depending on the current OID > counter it would usually show up either at the end or the beginning. > I think the general feeling is that this is too implementation-dependent > to be acceptable. Well, we don't need the enum value to map into the entire oid range. Can't we just add one to the top-most value and see if there is a conflict? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: