Re: ps display "waiting for max_standby_delay"
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ps display "waiting for max_standby_delay" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201006102223.o5AMN9o20640@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ps display "waiting for max_standby_delay" (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: ps display "waiting for max_standby_delay"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Takahiro Itagaki wrote: > Hi, > > We have codes to change ps display for recovery process during hot standby. > The current code always shows max_standby_delay for the message, but how > about showing actual waiting time instead? Since DBAs can always get the > parameter from postgresql.conf they wrote, so the parameter value itself > is not so useful. Actual waiting time might be more useful to determine > which values to be set to max_standby_delay, no? > > [backend/storage/ipc/standby.c] > snprintf(new_status + len, 50, > " waiting for max_standby_delay (%d ms)", > MaxStandbyDelay); ==> GetCurrentTimestamp() - waitStart > set_ps_display(new_status, false); > > I think SQL-based activity view will be more useful than ps display, > but it's an item for 9.1. Sounds interesting, but how often would the ps statust display be updated? I hope not too often. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: