Re: failover vs. read only queries
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: failover vs. read only queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100609.175619.98877714.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | failover vs. read only queries (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> When the trigger file is created while the recovery keeps > waiting for the release of the lock by read only queries, > it might take a very long time for the standby to become > the master. The recovery cannot go ahead until those read > only queries have gone away. This would increase the downtime > at the failover, and degrade the high availability. > > To fix the problem, when the trigger file is found, I think > that we should cancel all the running read only queries > immediately (or forcibly use -1 as the max_standby_delay > since that point) and make the recovery go ahead. If some > people prefer queries over failover even when they create the > trigger file, we can make the trigger behavior selectable in > response to the content of the trigger file like pg_standby > does. > > This problem looks like a bug, so I'd like to fix that for > 9.0. But the amount of code change might not be small. > Thought? +1. Down time of HA system is really important for HA users. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: