Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005281421.o4SELNq13210@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> ... indeed. Is it worth burdening the pg_stats mechanism with this? > >> The use case seems vanishingly thin. > > > I am confused how this is different from inet_server_addr() and > > inet_server_port(). > > I think the point is to let someone find out *from another session* > which server port number a particular session is using. I fail to see > a significant use case for that, though. Uh, aren't they all using the same server port number, e.g. 5432? Is the issue different IP addresses for the same server? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: