Re: Londiste
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Londiste |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005270222.o4R2Med27235@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Londiste (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Londiste
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > Francisco Reyes wrote: > >> >> Bruce Momjian writes: > >> >> > >> >> > Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention > >> >> > it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. ?We do aleady mention > >> >> > many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think > >> >> > >> >> Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the replication section > >> >> of the wiki: > >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pool > >> >> ing > >> >> > >> >> A search for replication on the top of the doc page (ie > >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/index.html) takes to the high > >> >> availability page, so a reference there to the wiki page may be a good idea. > >> > > >> > That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are > >> > probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs. ?I > >> > will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our > >> > docs. > >> > >> I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki. ?That > >> seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches. ?But on the other hand, > >> I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the > >> PG ecosystem. > > > > Well, the problem is that we have more solutions that fit in the docs in > > normal places. > > Isn't that just a matter of rejiggering the page formatting a little bit? The point is that there is a lot of replication information I don't want to merge into that SGML page so even if we mention "Londiste", the wiki reference is still useful. I have the same problem with mentioning pooling in the docs --- there is no natural place to put it, but I can reference the wiki from the performance SGML docs. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: