Re: Londiste
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Londiste |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005262145.o4QLjFF24049@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Londiste (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Londiste
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Francisco Reyes wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian writes: > >> > >> > Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention > >> > it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. ?We do aleady mention > >> > many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think > >> > >> Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the replication section > >> of the wiki: > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pool > >> ing > >> > >> A search for replication on the top of the doc page (ie > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/index.html) takes to the high > >> availability page, so a reference there to the wiki page may be a good idea. > > > > That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are > > probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs. ?I > > will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our > > docs. > > I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki. That > seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches. But on the other hand, > I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the > PG ecosystem. Well, the problem is that we have more solutions that fit in the docs in normal places. I was thinking of just linking to major wiki pages, like replication and pooling. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: