Re: quoting and recovery.conf
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: quoting and recovery.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005140037.o4E0bRi18342@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: quoting and recovery.conf (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: quoting and recovery.conf
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Is there a reason we require single quotes around boolean values in > > recovery.conf? > > > > ? ? ? ?standby_mode = 'off' > > > > This does not work: > > > > ? ? ? ?standby_mode = off > > > > I knew there were inconsistencies between quoting in postgresql.conf and > > recovery.conf, but I didn't realize it extended to boolean quoting. ?I > > see this at the top of recovery.conf now: > > > > ? ? ? ?# This file consists of lines of the form: > > ? ? ? ?# > > ? ? ? ?# ? name = 'value' > > ? ? ? ?# > > ? ? ? ?# (The quotes around the value are NOT optional, but the "=" is.) > > ? ? ? ?# > > > > and this issue existed in 8.4 as well. ?Seems I just never noticed it, > > and it not specifically mentioned in the TODO item we already have. > > I think we should add a TODO to parse recovery.conf with the same code > we use to parse postgresql.conf, or possibly merge the two files. > This issue was previously alluded to here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg00211.php We have a TODO already for this: Allow recovery.conf to support the same syntax as postgresql.conf,including quoting * recovery.conf parsing problems I thought the problem was just quotes inside strings, not the requirement of quotes for everything. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: