Re: pg_upgrade code questions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade code questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005131506.o4DF6uD12862@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade code questions (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade code questions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Devrim G?ND?Z <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:13 +0900, Takahiro Itagaki wrote: > >> ==== 4. EDB_NATIVE_LANG ==== > >> Of course it is commented out with #ifdef, but do we have codes > >> for EDB in core? > > > > I was about to raise similar thing, for the documentation: > > > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/pgupgrade.html > > > > This includes some references to EDB AS, which should be removed from > > PostgreSQL official documentation, IMHO. > > +1 on getting rid of those references. Agreed. When it was on pgFoundry, I had to mention that because it was unclear who would be using it, but in /contrib we know this is for community Postgres. EnterpriseDB did contribute the code so I would like to keep the code working for EnterpriseDB Advanced Server if that is easy. I have added SGML comments to comment out the text that mentions EDB Advanced Server. Is that enough? Should I remove the text from the SGML? Should I move it to the bottom of the SGML? Should I remove the EnterpriseDB Advanced Server checks from the C code too? I don't remember having to deal with anything like this before, so I am unclear how to proceed. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: