Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005122307.o4CN73O26196@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Now that it only targets the packaged version, I can do with a single > > shared object, but maybe it needs to be more generic, like > > pg_upgrade_tools.so or something like that. > > +1 for pg_upgrade_tools or pg_upgrade_support or some such name. I like 'pg_upgrade_support'. I could also do 'pg_upgrade_funcs'. > > I realize we need a separate pgxs makefile for the executable and shared > > libraries. My question was whether the shared library directory should > > be under /contrib or under /contrib/pg_upgrade. > > It has to be directly under /contrib, because the MSVC build scripts > only look there for contrib modules to build. OK. Should I get started? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: