Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005081848.o48Imak02225@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > With a plugin option, I would not object to option 1. > > If option 1 was taken, without plugins, it's clear that would be against > consensus. > > Having said that, I'll confirm now there will not be an extreme reaction > from me if option (1) was forced, nor do I counsel that from others. I found this email amusing. You phrase it like the community is supposed to be worried by an objection from you or an "extreme reaction"; I certainly am not. You have been in the community long enough to not use such phrasing. This is not the first time I have complained about this. I have no idea why an objection from you should mean more than an objection from anyone else in the community, and I have no idea what an "extreme reaction" means, or why anyone should care. Do you think the community is negotiting with you? I think the concensus is to change this setting to a boolean. If you don't want to do it, I am sure we can find someone who will. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: