Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201005052344.o45NioB21309@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > So what was the conclusion here? Is pg_migrator going to be in contrib > for beta2 or 3, after cleaning it up? Thanks for asking. :-) I can add pg_migrator to contrib by the end of next week, so it will be in beta2. I will remove 8.4 as a migration target, which will allow the removal of some C code and documentation warnings. Unless I hear otherwise, I will start on it in the next few days. Total work will be < 8 hours, including testing. One outstanding question is whether we want to rename pg_migrator to something clearer, like pg_upgrade or pg_binary_upgrade. (pg_upgrade was the original name for this migration method in the 1998.) I am slightly concerned that the "migration" word is too associated with cross-database-product migration. (There are no mentions of "pg_migrator" in our CVS now, except for an 8.4 release note item mention when pg_dump --binary-upgrade was added.) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: