Re: pg_migrator

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. �Do
> >> we still want to do that?
> 
> > I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for
> > keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the
> > 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time.
> 
> I concur; it's about a month too late to propose this.

I am confused why it is late.  We add to /contrib even during beta, and
I didn't bring it up earlier because I didn't want to be pushing my own
software.  Was someone else supposed to suggest it a month ago?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com