Re: should I post the patch as committed?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should I post the patch as committed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100420171141.GB3229@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should I post the patch as committed? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: should I post the patch as committed?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian escribió: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Yeah, +1. I always go to one of the other sources (most of the time, > > the gitweb or git server). > > > > It doesn't hurt to attach it if it happens to be around, but I > > wouldn't suggest spending any extra effort on it... > > Well, many times I am applying a patch from an author that I have > modified, and I don't expect them to be subscribed to committers, so I > supply the patch as a courtesy so they can see my changes (and fix > them). :-) I think committing a patch from a non-regular is a special case and attaching the modified patch is reasonable in that case. My 8.8 Richter ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: