Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201004010143.o311hb321085@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > After snapshotting my master using hot backup to create a workable > slave instance, I created recovery.conf on the slave and tried to get > it to connect to the master and stream WAL. > > This led to the message "sorry, too many standbys already", which did > not immediately clue me in as to what I needed to do to fix the > problem. Grepping the source code for the error message revealed that > the problem was that MaxWalSenders was zero. A few seconds further > head-scratching revealed that this was the GUC max_wal_senders, which > I duly increased from 0 to 1, after which it worked. > > I think perhaps this error message needs some adjustment. It should > be reasonably possible to guess the name of the GUC that needs > increasing based on the error message, and it currently isn't. Also > I'd vote for making the variable name max_wal_senders rather than > MaxWalSenders, but maybe that's being persnicketty. Glad the error message has been improved. I was bitten by this exact error message and didn't know the cause for a while, and was going to suggest such a fix. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: