Re: Warm Standby Setup Documentation
От | Yar Tykhiy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Warm Standby Setup Documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100329004558.GB3229@buka.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Warm Standby Setup Documentation (Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Warm Standby Setup Documentation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:35:43PM -0500, Ogden wrote: > On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > > > Bryan Murphy wrote: > >> The one thing you should be aware of is that when you fail over, your spare has no spares. I have not found a way aroundthis problem yet. So, when you fail over, there is a window where you have no backups while you're building the newspares. This can be pretty nerve wracking if your database is like ours and it takes 3-6 hours to bring a new spare onlinefrom scratch. > > > > If there's another server around, you can have your archive_command on the master ship to two systems, then use the secondone as a way to jump-start this whole process. After fail-over, just start shipping from the new primary to that 3rdserver, now the replacement standby, and sync any files it doesn't have. Then switch it into recovery. Much faster thandoing a new base backup from the standby on larger systems. > > How is it possible to use the archive_command to ship to different ones? > > archive_command = 'rsync -a %p postgres@192.168.x.x:/usr/local/pgsql/walfiles/%f </dev/null' > archive_timeout = 120 # force a logfile segment switch after this > > I suppose you can put multiple commands there then? You can always wrap as many commands as you like in a script. However, there is a pitfall to watch out for when shipping WALs to multiple standby servers. Namely your script has to handle failures of individual WAL shipping targets so that a single target going down doesn't disrupt operation of the whole cluster. Please see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-10/msg00590.php for discussion. Yar
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: