Re: bug in function arguments "recognition"
От | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bug in function arguments "recognition" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100303164126.51a18ef3@dawn.webthatworks.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bug in function arguments "recognition" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:22:31 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it> writes: > > I've a function defined as: > > create or replace function catalog_relateditems(__itemid bigint, > > families int[]... > > If you want any useful comments, you're going to have to show a > complete example, rather than selectively editing out what you > think is irrelevant (and, no doubt, isn't). Golden rule... I thought that psql auto completion was a good enough proof something wasn't working and I was thinking if someone could give me a good advice to trim down the clutter to build up a simpler function that could misbehave. I was not aware that in and out parameters could be intermixed and I was expecting an error, but pg was pretty happy with the syntax and this was enough to put me astray. Sorry -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: