Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201002261825.o1QIP4525584@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple
jobs", so partly revert
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Log Message: > > > > ----------- > > > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the > > > > previous patch. > > > > > > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the > > > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring > > > a dump makes no mention of this new facility, > > The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points We don't usually modify past release notes. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: