Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl

David, I am sorry this didn't get applied, and the code has drifted too
much to apply it now.  Would you be able to make a new patch to make our
Perl files strict?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:04:18PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Here is a diff of version_stamp.pl. It is not quite done as I can't
> >> actually get it to run. No matter what I do it doesn't appear to be able
> >> to open configure.in.
> >>
> >> If someone could help me figure out where I am being stupid I would
> >> appreciate it.
> >
> >
> > Maybe you aren't running it in the right directory (i.e. the directory  
> > where configure.in exists)?
> >
> > Anyway, I think what you want to achieve (without all the git crap) is  
> > the attached.
> 
> Here's some git crap, but it makes all the .pl programs strict-clean.
> Many are still horrendous, though.
> 
> Cheers,
> David.
> -- 
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
> Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
> 
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +