Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201002241537.o1OFbHs06694@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton
mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner > >> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > >>> per http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Release_Support_Policy 7.4 is > >>> still supported for a few months to come (and will be EOL'd together with > >>> 8.0). I'm also not really sure why we need to change stuff like that, this > >>> kind of information might still be useful for somebody trying to upgrade > >>> from an unsupported release to a supported one. > >> > >> Yeah. > > > Well, the documentation still exists in the old releases, even 8.4. The > > big question is how much back-version information we should keep in our > > docs, and does it make sense to keep paragraphs around that are only > > meaningful to < 1% of people reading it. Some people are saying keep > > more, some are saying keep less, so I am betting I have hit the proper > > balance. ;-) > > I didn't really agree with what you took out before, and I am definitely > going to object to this latest set of diffs. What it appears to me > you have done is a search-and-destroy on any paragraph mentioning "7.x", > without any consideration of whether that removes important information > from the overall presentation. Those paras are generally comparing old > and new behavior, and even if you don't care specifically what the old > behavior was, they present useful explanation of the new behavior. Yea, let me try again and rephrase some of it to highlight the behavior and not the version change. > I also agree with the objection that there are still lots of people who > are going to be trying to port old apps to 9.0. Well, I stand by my statement that it is a judgement call on how much we keep, and there is a cost to readers to keep it, but there isn't very much of it. Are the people who wanted more aggressive removal OK with putting back the pre-7.4 documentation mentions? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.comPG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive,Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: