Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly
От | Tim Bunce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100223203946.GN1018@timac.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:31:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes: > > How about something like the below? > > I still think that this is optimizing the wrong thing. We care about > the clarity of the message the user sees, not about how short or clean > the Perl code is. I'm inclined to stay with the same basic > implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's > more verbose -v output. There's no need to try to parse the perl -v output, which is intended for humans and may change in future. Using perl -e 'print $]' will give you the version number in floating point format for all versions of perl. For perl5 the format is 5.xxxyyy so testing for >= 5.008 (or ideally 5.008001) will work fine. Tim.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: