Re: Fast or immediate shutdown
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fast or immediate shutdown |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201002191948.o1JJmup05240@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fast or immediate shutdown (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fast or immediate shutdown
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 17:04 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On tis, 2009-12-15 at 17:19 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > running with log_checkpoints = on > > > > > > pg_ctl -D foo -m fast stop > > > > > > log says > > > > > > LOG: received fast shutdown request > > > LOG: aborting any active transactions > > > LOG: shutting down > > > LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate > > > > > > Some of us know that the "immediate" word refers to the restartpoint > > > request, though that word causes conceptual conflict with the shutdown > > > mode, which was fast, not immediate. > > > > > > Think we need to change the wording of this > > > > > > LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate > > > > > > so it is clearer what we mean > > > > We *do* we mean? And why are we logging it? > > The words after the colon refer to options sent to RequestCheckpoint and > it is logged because we asked for it by doing log_checkpoints = on. > > I suggest we say "smoothed" when checkpoint option is !immediate. So we > will remove the word "immediate" from the message. Did we decide not the change this? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: