Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100218151345.GC6317@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > >>Doesn't that require that all pgindent runs produce the same output? > >>Which they generally don't due to different sets of typedefs and > >>stuff? It's a solvable problem of course, but not quite as simple as > >>you make it sound :-) > > > >The typedef file emitted by the buildfarm is supposed to be rather > >static, no? > > Umm, static in what sense? Clearly if we add things to the code that > can involve extra typedefs being found. The buildfarm's list is the > union of all the typedefs found by the contributing members at the > time they do their runs. Yeah, but most typedefs are already there; I mean we're not likely to change even 5% of the current list. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: