Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201002161613.o1GGD9326869@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > * Listen / Notify rewrite. This is the only one of the remaining > > patches that is not marked as Ready for Committer, but I think it > > would be good if someone (probably Tom) at least took a look at it. > > I'm not sure if it's committable at this point, but we should at least > > try to provide some good feedback. > > I will look at this one. It'd be nice to get it in if at all possible, > because the existing listen/notify infrastructure won't play very nicely > with HS --- eg, inspecting pg_listener on the slave might yield the > false impression that some of the slave-side backends had active LISTENs > because of chance matches of PID. Good point. Is pg_listener the only place we expose PIDs in heap files? I know we expose them in views but those are not affected by HS, I believe. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: