Re: review: More frame options in window functions
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: More frame options in window functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100212154934.GE3737@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: More frame options in window functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: More frame options in window functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió: > Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: > > Searching the archives ain't helping me refresh those memories. So it > > seems the case for an extended opclass infrastructure, or a new side > > one, is between thin an non-existent yet? > > Yeah, I don't immediately see anything that would justify going to > that level of effort. Adding +/- as support functions for btree > seems like the thing to do. Would it work to use a fake access method instead? If we add it to btree, will we be able to backtrack and move that to a separate catalog if we ever determine that it would have been better? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: