Re: log_error_verbosity function display
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: log_error_verbosity function display |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201002110317.o1B3HAS12974@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: log_error_verbosity function display (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: log_error_verbosity function display
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Right now, log_error_verbosity displays the source code error location > > in this format: > > > LOCATION: parserOpenTable, parse_relation.c:858 > > > I think it would be clearer to add '()' next to the function name. We > > use '() to display function names in our docs and I think using '()' > > would clarify the output, e.g.: > > > LOCATION: parserOpenTable(), parse_relation.c:858 > > Seems like a waste of log space to me. The convention about writing () > to decorate function names is hardly universal, and anyway it's mainly > useful to mark things that the reader might not realize are function > names. This can't be anything else. I suggested it because it wasn't obvious to me it was a function name, so I figured others might not recognize it. Remember, we deal with the C code all the time so we have to consider how the general user would see it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: