Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION
От | Takahiro Itagaki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100205090834.9BE7.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports
incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Randy Isbell <jisbell@cisco.com> wrote: > > An inconsistency exists between the segment name reported by > > pg_stop_backup() and the actual WAL file name. > > > > START WAL LOCATION: 10/FE1E2BAC (file 0000000200000010000000FE) > > STOP WAL LOCATION: 10/FF000000 (file 0000000200000010000000FF) > But it was rejected because its change might break the existing app. It might break existing applications if it returns "FE" instead of "FF", but never-used filename surprises users. (IMO, the existing apps probably crash if "FF" returned, i.e, 1/256 of the time.) Should it return the *next* reasonable log filename instead of "FF"? For example, 000000020000002000000000 for the above case. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: