Re: plpython3
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpython3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201002012113.o11LDdQ00421@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpython3 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpython3
Re: plpython3 Re: plpython3 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Peter Eisentraut escribi?: > > On m?n, 2010-02-01 at 12:01 -0800, Nathan Boley wrote: > > > I code nearly exclusively in python and C, but I have > > > often found pl/python to be very unwieldy. For this reason I often > > > use pl/perl or pl/pgsql for problems that, outside of postgres, I > > > would always use python. > > > > I find that curious, because much of the criticism about the current > > PL/Python can be traced back to the fact that the implementation used to > > be an exact copy of PL/Perl. > > Perhaps the problem is that PL/Perl used to be unwieldy back when > PL/Python was created. PL/Perl has definitely seen a lot more activity. I would love to know why PL/Python can't be incrementally improved like the rest of our code. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: