Re: default_language

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:26:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:30 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> +1 for removing default_do_language, too.
> 
> > +1 for removing default_do_language OR adding default_language.
> 
> > I prefer a hard-wired default of PLpgSQL, so a missing language
> > statement on a DO block is always interpreted the same.
> 
> So it seems everyone is okay with the latter?  (Remove
> default_do_language in place of a hard-wired default of "plpgsql",
> don't change CREATE FUNCTION's behavior.)

The whole default_to_language thing seems like a great way to have
spooky breakage at a distance, so +1 for removing it.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate