Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode
От | Michael Meskes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100124142324.GA12432@feivel.credativ.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native
mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:11:51PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > > Why does the preproc spit out ECPGset_var's but no ECPGget_var's in this test case? > > > > Because there's no ECPGget_var()s emitted for > - global variables > - variables in the same function > > ECPGget_var() is only used in case the cursor declaration > used INTO/USING and it's in a different function from > the one where OPEN/FETCH/CLOSE reside. But this > cannot be determined easily, e.g. short of making ECPG > a two-pass precompiler, so ECPGset_var() is always used. This shows some well thought implementation. But what I was wondering about was why this is used as test case. While I see the need to test this part of ecpg I thought this test case was added because it showed a problem without your changes. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes@jabber.org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: