Re: pg_migrator issues
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_migrator issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201001061611.o06GB2615077@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_migrator issues (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Dne 4.01.10 19:28, Alvaro Herrera napsal(a): > > Bruce Momjian escribi?: > > > >> I considered that but realize that pg_migrator has to read > >> pg_controldata in both the old and new servers, meaning it would need > >> access to both C structures, and considering they both have the same > >> structure names, that would require some odd C tricks. Add to that you > >> don't know which version of Postgres you are migrating from/to during > >> compile and the idea of using C becomes even less attractive. > > > > However, keep in mind that this might not be the last time on which we > > will want to read something from a C struct, so perhaps it would be good > > to bite the bullet and write the odd tricks. Does it already have > > access (at compile time) to the old and new source trees? > > I have some proof of concept when each control data struct version > version have one header file like pg_control_843.h and structure like > ControlFileData has name ControlFileData_843. The main pg_control.h > defines types without version like > > typedef ControlFileData_843 ControlFileData; > > I planed to do it for 8.5 but unfortunately no time :( commit fest is > too close. Yea, I think the confusion of doing it isn't worth it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: