Re: uintptr_t for Datum
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: uintptr_t for Datum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200912311844.nBVIiWn18036@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: uintptr_t for Datum (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: uintptr_t for Datum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to > >> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader. > > > I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been > > part of autoconf? > > It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in > really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit > it, you just generate it. Well, that's pretty confusing considering it has a .in suffix, just like configure.in, which we do edit, but I get your point. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: