Re: join ordering via Simulated Annealing
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: join ordering via Simulated Annealing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200912261730.54730.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | join ordering via Simulated Annealing (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: join ordering via Simulated Annealing
Re: join ordering via Simulated Annealing |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 02:23:55 Jan Urbański wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing with using a Simulated Annealing-type algorithm for > determinig join ordering for relations. Very cool. > Lastly, I'm lacking good testcases or even a testing approach: I'm > generating silly queries and looking at how they get optimised, but if > someone has a real dataset and examples of joins that cannot be planned > with the standard planner, I would be interested to compare the results > my prototype gets with those produced by GEQO. If you want to see some queries which are rather hard to plan with random search you can look at http://archives.postgresql.org/message- id/200907091700.43411.andres@anarazel.de which tom analyzed and improved here http://archives.postgresql.org/message- id/17807.1247932094@sss.pgh.pa.us They are hard to plan because they have lots and lots of join order restrictions. While this example is rather extreme I have found quite many such queries so far. Robert had another example in 603c8f070911271205r4d4534edt1cebcb76ff5066a5@mail.gmail.com that might be interesting. Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: