Re: New VACUUM FULL
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091215135013.GB3956@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New VACUUM FULL (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: New VACUUM FULL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Takahiro Itagaki wrote: > Here is an updated patch rebased to the latest CVS HEAD. > > One remaining concern is VERBOSE. Log messages by FULL (rewrite) are less > verbose than FULL INPLACE. The same can be said for CLUSTER VERBOSE, though. > I don't have any plans to make CLUSTER more verbose in the patch, but > "more verbose CLUSTER" could be a TODO item. Hmm. With this patch, if I do "vacuumdb -f" it will not vacuum the special system catalogs that can only be vacuumed with INPLACE, correct? If that's correct, I wonder whether it would be good to do a regular not-inplace VF for most relations, and do INPLACE for those catalogs. That way, if a sysadmin has a vacuumdb -f in crontab, it will continue to do what he expects. Maybe this is not important if Simon is able to get inplace working for all catalogs. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: