New VACUUM FULL still needed?
От | Takahiro Itagaki |
---|---|
Тема | New VACUUM FULL still needed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091215111710.0FE1.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Syntax for partitioning (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed?
Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > I have enough items emerging from HS to keep me busy much longer than I > thought. I'll run with VF if that's OK, since I have some other related > changes in that area and it makes sense to understand that code also, if > OK with you. Sure. Many users want to see HS. BTW, New VACUUM FULL patch is waiting for being applied. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=202 But I heard HS is attempting to modify VFI in another way or remove it completely. Do we still need the patch, or reject it and fix VFI in HS? Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: