Largeobject Access Controls and pg_migrator
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Largeobject Access Controls and pg_migrator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200912130139.nBD1dMS20714@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Largeobject Access Controls and pg_migrator
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > KaiGai Kohei wrote: > > > What happens when > > > there is no entry in pg_largeobject_metadata for a specific row? > > > > In this case, these rows become orphan. > > So, I think we need to create an empty large object with same LOID on > > pg_migrator. It makes an entry on pg_largeobject_metadata without > > writing anything to the pg_largeobject. > > I guess rest of migrations are not difference. Correct? > > Agreed. I have modified pg_migrator with the attached patch which > creates a script that adds default permissions for all large object > tables. Oops, seem like I have a problem in getting pg_migrator to populate pg_largeobject_metadata: test=> select lo_import('/etc/profile'); lo_import----------- 16385(1 row)test=> select lo_import('/etc/profile.env');lo_import----------- 16386(1 row)test=> select oid,* from pg_largeobject_metadata; oid | lomowner | lomacl-------+----------+-------- 16385 | 10 | 16386 | 10 |(2 rows) You might remember that INSERT cannot set the oid of a row, so I don't see how pg_migrator can migrate this? Is there a reason we used 'oid' in pg_largeobject_metadata but 'lobj' in pg_largeobject? Why did't we add the lomowner and lomacl columns to pg_largeobject? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: