Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
От | Takahiro Itagaki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091211101656.8C66.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: > > we still allow "SELECT * FROM pg_largeobject" ...right? > > It can be solved with revoking any privileges from anybody in the initdb > phase. So, we should inject the following statement for setup_privileges(). > > REVOKE ALL ON pg_largeobject FROM PUBLIC; OK, I'll add the following description in the documentation of pg_largeobject. <structname>pg_largeobject</structname> should not be readable by the public, since the catalog contains data in largeobjects of all users. <structname>pg_largeobject_metadata</> is a publicly readable catalog that only contains identifiersof large objects. > {"lo_compat_privileges", PGC_SUSET, COMPAT_OPTIONS_PREVIOUS, > gettext_noop("Turn on/off privilege checks on large objects."), The description is true, but gives a confusion because "lo_compat_privileges = on" means "privilege checks are turned off". short desc: Enables backward compatibility in privilege checks on large objects long desc: When turned on, privilege checkson large objects are disabled. Are those descriptions appropriate? Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: