Re: Need --without-docs build switch
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need --without-docs build switch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091210193257.GN15554@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Need --without-docs build switch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > > On 12/10/09 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >>> Testing Alpha2 with the Exclusion Constraints patch on Mac recently > >>> forced me to edit the makefiles to remove the make docs statements. > >> > >> How so? The make process does not try to build the docs unless you > >> specifically tell it to. > > > It most certainly did with Alpha2. > > Hm, maybe the alpha2 tarball had docs in it already? And they weren't > up to date? You might be hitting the same thing I've complained of: > since "make distclean" no longer removes built docs, you can find > yourself running an update cycle when you didn't want to. Peter > rejected my opinion that we should go back to the old behavior of > "make distclean", but I'm still not happy about it. > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg01336.php If the patch added new docs, then a doc build would be invoked by make. A "make -C doc maintainer-clean" would remove the trigger files and thus the docs would not be built after applying the patch. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: