Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
От | Takahiro Itagaki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091208134656.484D.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > (1) Blocks Shared: (hit=2 read=1641 written=0) Local: (hit=0 read=0 > > written=0) Temp: (read=1443 written=1443) > I could live with the equals signs, but the use of parentheses seems > weird and inconsistent with normal english usage (which permits > parentheses as a means of making parenthetical comments). (You can > also put an entire sentence in parentheses.) But you can't: (do > this). +1 for (1) personally, if we could think it is not in English but just a symbol. I have another idea to make it alike with ANALYZE output. (4) Blocks (shared hit=2 read=1641 ...) (local hit=0 ...) (temp read=0 ...) Which is the best? I think it's a matter of preference. (0) 109 characters - Shared Blocks: hit 2 read 1641 wrote 0, ...(1) 105 characters - Blocks Shared: (hit=2 ... (2) 96 characters - Blocks Shared:hit=2 ... (3) 82 characters - BlocksShared:(hit=2 ... (4) 82 characters - Blocks (shared hit=2 ... BTW, I found text is a *bad* format because it requires much discussion ;) We have a little choice in XML, JSON and YAML formats. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: