Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091208021201.GR3552@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion
Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > If we do need to do this, perhaps we should change the older parameter > > to be partition_exclusion. > > Yeah, if we do want to do something about this then changing the name of > the existing GUC would be a lot less work. However, partition_exclusion > seems to imply that it *only* applies to partitioned tables, which is > not the case... Perhaps table_exclusion = {on, off, partition} Of course, constraint_exclusion should continue to work as a synonym for backwards compatibility, but it wouldn't be documented. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: